Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than the Galaxy A11's overall score of 73.3. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than the Galaxy A11, we must tell that it's also older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a way greater pixel count per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy A11 has better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.