Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is slightly better than Galaxy A11, getting a 76.6 score against 73.3. These devices come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 10 version while Galaxy A11 has Android 11. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a heavier and thicker cellphone than Galaxy A11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a higher pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a way better camera than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A11, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.