Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is better than Galaxy A11's global score of 73.3. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than the Galaxy A11, it must be noted that it is also thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A11 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a 26% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A11, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.