Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is just a bit better than Galaxy A13 5G, with a global score of 88.1 against 82.1. The iPhone X design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A13 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone X counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a way higher 1125 x 2436px resolution.
The iPhone X features a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal storage. IPhone X counts with a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera. The Galaxy A13 5G features a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.