Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a general score of 82.1, which is a little bit better than iPhone XR's global score of 82. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G design is incredibly newer, but just a bit heavier and a bit thicker than iPhone XR. The iPhone XR features a quite better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has lesser CPU cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone XR has a better display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a little bit better pixels quantity in each screen inch. Galaxy A13 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone XR's storage for apps and games is just as good as Galaxy A13 5G's one, they have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A13 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.