Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A13 5G has an overall score of 82.1, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3's 80 score. Galaxy A13 5G is a noticeably newer phone than Google Pixel 3, although it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way greater pixels density.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A13 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Galaxy A13 5G also has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 3 features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G one, both of them have equal internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.