Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A13 5G's score of 82.1. The Google Pixel 5 body is way lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A13 5G, although it was released just a little further than a year before. Google Pixel 5 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and way more pixels per display inch.
The Google Pixel 5 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a lot better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.