Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A13 5G is a bit better than the HTC One M9, with a overall score of 82.1 against 77.7. Although Galaxy A13 5G is somewhat heavier than HTC One M9, it's a little bit thinner and also extremely newer. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A13 5G has 12 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU. HTC One M9 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixels amount per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080.
Galaxy A13 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A13 5G also has a back camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 128 GB. The Galaxy A13 5G has a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.