Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G is a bit better than HTC U11, getting a score of 82.1 against 77.6. Although the Galaxy A13 5G is notably newer than HTC U11, it is thicker and heavier. HTC U11 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much higher display pixel density.
HTC U11 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. HTC U11 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U11 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 128 GB.
The Galaxy A13 5G features a superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.