Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-03 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's global score of 82.1. Despite of the fact that the LG G8 ThinQ is older than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, it's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner. These devices have Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12, providing a couple additional features.
LG G8 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Galaxy A13 5G counts with just a bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
LG G8 ThinQ has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a much longer battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.