Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a global score of 82.1, which is a bit better than the LG V10's overall score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G design is a lot newer than LG V10's, although it's just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a newer 12 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1.
Galaxy A13 5G has a superior processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A13 5G also has a larger number of cores. LG V10 has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen density and a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG V10 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V10 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a way less MP back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A13 5G features a superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.