Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A13 5G's 82.1 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12, so it provides you a lot of extra features. Although the LG V30S ThinQ is extremely older than the Galaxy A13 5G, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
LG V30S ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. Galaxy A13 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.