Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with an 82.1 score against 81.3. Galaxy A13 5G's body is extremely newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's heavier and thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way better pixels quantity per display inch. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A13 5G features a much better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A13 5G features just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.