Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, with a global score of 82.1 against 81.2. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A13 5G has the newer 12 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features and increased performance. Galaxy A13 5G's body is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the LG V40 ThinQ.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way greater pixel count per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A13 5G features a much better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a little bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.