Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's global score of 82.1. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version, giving a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, although it's just a bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a greater pixel density, a little larger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A13 5G has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and a 50 MP camera, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.