Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A13 5G's general score of 82.1. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version, providing you a lot of extra features. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A13 5G, it's a bit thinner and extremely newer.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a quite larger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 50 mega-pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much higher (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.