Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-12-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has an overall score of 82.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G design is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has an older 12 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Moto Z Force has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much higher pixels quantity per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also has a greater number of 2200 megahertz cores.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also has a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.