Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 15 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 270 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 82.1 score against 79.2. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has the older 12 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a much powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a little better battery performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.