Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 82.1 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's body is noticeably newer, a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has an older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bigger display and a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better performance than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy A13 5G's battery lifetime. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a better camera than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a back camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.