Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G has a global score of 82.1, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A13 5G has a newer 12 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Galaxy A13 5G is a newer device, and it's also a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a greater pixel density, a way higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little larger display. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much more megapixels camera in the back and a lot better video definition.
Galaxy A13 5G counts with a little better battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.