Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A13 5G's 82.1 global score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is way older than the Galaxy A13 5G, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A13 5G. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a better display pixel density. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. Galaxy A13 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.