Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-03 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Galaxy A13 5G, getting a 97.6 score against 82.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is extremely older and much heavier than the Galaxy A13 5G, it's construction is still incredibly thinner. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version, giving you some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a quite larger display, a way higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4380mAh. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.