Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, having a global score of 82.1 against 79.3. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's construction is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Note 5. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a newer 12 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also has 7 more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also has a back camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The Galaxy Note 5's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.