Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than Galaxy A13 5G, having an 89 score against 82.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note10 is way older than Galaxy A13 5G, it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.