Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than the Galaxy A13 5G, with a global score of 94.8 against 82.1. The Galaxy S20 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A13 5G, even though it was released only 21 months before. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.