Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, having a 98 score against 82.1. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, but it is somewhat heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a battery performance that's very similar to Galaxy A13 5G's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.