Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, getting a global score of 83.3 against 82.1. Galaxy S9's construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S9 counts with a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 400 GB.
Galaxy A13 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A13 5G has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.