Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a general score of 82.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a lot higher amount of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A13 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A13 5G has better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.