Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's 82.1 score. These phones include the same Android 12 OS. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip has a better display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, way more pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a very superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.