Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, having a 92.3 score against 82.1. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is a bit lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, even though it was released about 16 months before. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a lot higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.