Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Galaxy A13 5G, having a score of 94.6 against 82.1. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and incredibly heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A13 5G, but Samsung was able to make it incredibly thinner anyway. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a brighter display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a better pixel count in each display inch, a bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much better video definition.
The Galaxy A13 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.