Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a score of 82.1 against 81.1. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A13 5G has a more recent 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, giving some additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy A13 5G is a just a little lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but they have the same thickness.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a higher pixel number in each inch in the display and a little bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a battery performance that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.