Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-01-04 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, getting an 83.3 score against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy S9 body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy S9 features a better screen than Galaxy A14 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a greater pixels count in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A14 5G has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A14 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A14 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S9 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.