Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, with an 87.1 score against 77.4. Even though Apple iPhone 8 Plus is way older and just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. IPhone 8 Plus has a screen that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's screen, because although the iPhone 8 Plus has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, much worse brightness and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2691mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 8 Plus, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.