Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 overall score. Even though Apple iPhone X is way older than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The iPhone X has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has way less brightness and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Apple iPhone X counts with a very superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy A15 5G features a superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.