Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having a general score of 82 against 77.4. IPhone XR's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but it's a little lighter. The iPhone XR counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a quite larger screen, a just a bit greater pixel density, a brighter display and a higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much better battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2942mAh. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone XR, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.