Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, with a global score of 84.2 against 77.4. The iPhone XS construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it was released many years before. IPhone XS features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a lot darker screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436. The Galaxy A15 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than iPhone XS, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.