Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 score. Google Pixel 3 is an older phone than Galaxy A15 5G, but it is just a little thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The Galaxy A15 5G has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A15 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 3 features a very superior processor than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a much higher resolution back camera. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.