Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Google Pixel 3 XL is an extremely older phone than the Galaxy A15 5G, but Google was able to build it a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a camera in the back with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46% more battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.