Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's general score of 77.4. The Google Pixel 4 is an notably older device than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but it is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 4 counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A15 5G features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.