Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A15 5G's overall score of 77.4. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL is a lot older than the Galaxy A15 5G, it's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G captures a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.