Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Google Pixel 5's construction is notably lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy A15 5G, although it was released 3 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per display inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 5 features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A15 5G has better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A15 5G, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.