Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is slightly better than Galaxy A15 5G, getting a 77.7 score against 77.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. HTC One M9's construction is way lighter than the Galaxy A15 5G, but it's thicker and was released 9 years before.
HTC One M9 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy A15 5G features much more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The HTC One M9 features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an additional GPU. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% greater battery size.
The Galaxy A15 5G takes clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a way more mega pixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC One M9 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.