Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G's general score of 77.4. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A15 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a really superior performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. Galaxy A15 5G features a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.