Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G's overall score of 77.4. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is extremely older than Galaxy A15 5G, it's body is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A15 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A15 5G features a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A15 5G has a much better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the Galaxy A15 5G, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.