Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Galaxy A15 5G, getting a overall score of 91.2 against 77.4. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but LG Wing has older 10 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. Although the LG Wing is better than the Galaxy A15 5G, it must be noted that it is also noticeably older, extremely thicker and heavier.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density. The LG Wing features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A15 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Wing counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG Wing takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Wing also has a way higher video definition and a much more MP camera.
The Galaxy A15 5G features greater battery life than LG Wing, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.