Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-12-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A15 5G has a score of 77.4, which is slightly better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A15 5G has an older 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Even though the Galaxy A15 5G is incredibly newer than the Moto Z Force, it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
Moto Z Force counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has less CPU cores (although faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z Force has a screen that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's display, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A15 5G features a way better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy A15 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.