Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 200.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a global score of 77.4, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's body is notably newer, but way heavier and extremely thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a slightly bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a way better processing power than Galaxy A15 5G. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2730mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A15 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.