Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's overall score of 77.4. Moto Z3's body is thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Moto Z3 features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A15 5G has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A15 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A15 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.