Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Galaxy A15 5G, getting an 87 score against 77.4. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A15 5G, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger screen, a quite higher screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video. Galaxy A15 5G features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A15 5G, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.